Audit the brand SERP
What actually appears for your name, your name plus “reviews”, and your name plus “complaints”. Recorded with screenshots, from a clean browser.
Reputation · Delhi NCR & remote
The last thing a prospect does before contacting you is search your business name. Whatever page one says at that moment is your actual pitch, whether you wrote it or not.
Short answer
Online reputation management is the work of controlling what appears when somebody searches your business or personal name. It has three parts: owning as many page-one results as possible with properties you control, responding properly to criticism, and pushing down what cannot be removed. Genuine removal is rare and is a legal process, not a marketing one.
Four details. A real reply the same day, from me.
01 The premise
The honest starting point is that almost nothing on the internet can be deleted on request. Removing content requires either the publisher agreeing, a court order, or the content breaching a platform’s own rules — and none of those is a marketing service. Anyone offering guaranteed removal is either describing a legal process they are not qualified to run, or is not being straight with you.
What can be done is change what people see. A search result page shows about ten results, and most people never reach the second page. If eight of those ten are properties you control — your site, your profiles, your listings, your published work — then a single negative item at position nine is substantially less damaging than the same item at position two.
That is genuinely achievable for most businesses, because brand-name searches are not competitive in the way that commercial keywords are. Almost nobody else is trying to rank for your business name. The work is unglamorous and it is mostly a matter of building and maintaining properties that should exist anyway.
02 Process
Order matters: measure first, because the reality is usually less severe than it feels.
What actually appears for your name, your name plus “reviews”, and your name plus “complaints”. Recorded with screenshots, from a clean browser.
A single old complaint on page two is not a crisis. A defamatory article at position two is. These need very different responses and very different budgets.
A calm, factual, public reply to a genuine criticism frequently does more good than any suppression work. The audience is the next reader, not the complainant.
Website, Google profile, LinkedIn, industry listings, published content, video. Legitimate properties that occupy page one because they deserve to.
Alerts on your name so the next issue is found in days rather than months. Early is cheap; late is expensive.
03 Straight talk
The right column is the majority of what people ask for when they call about this.
Free brand SERP audit
I will search your business name from a clean browser, screenshot page one, and send it to you with an honest assessment of how much of it you control and how much matters.
Four details, and a real reply today.
04 The territory
Roughly in the order they tend to rank for a brand-name search.
— Reputation
These sit next to reputation management and are usually bought with it. Same person doing the work in each case.
Reviews, mentions, monitoring.
Read more— Questions
Straight answers, including the ones that cost me work. If yours is not here, ask it — I reply the same day.
Almost never by request. Removal requires the publisher agreeing, a court order, or a genuine breach of platform rules. What is achievable is suppression — occupying the page-one results with properties you control so the item sits far enough down that most people never see it.
Only if it breaches Google’s policies — spam, conflict of interest, offensive content, or an obviously fake review. A truthful negative review from a real customer will not be removed, and it should not be. A calm, factual public reply does more for you than removal would.
Months, usually. You are building and strengthening properties until they outrank the item you want pushed down. Anyone promising a result in days is either describing something that is not happening or something you would not want to be associated with.
Yes, almost always. Reply calmly, acknowledge the specific issue, state what you did about it, and offer to continue offline. You are not writing to the reviewer — you are writing to every prospect who reads it afterwards, and a measured reply consistently helps.
Then it may be defamation, which is a legal question rather than a marketing one. Get legal advice. In parallel, the suppression and page-one work still applies, and it is usually faster than the legal route. I will tell you plainly where my work ends.
No. It is fraud, review platforms detect it increasingly well, and the damage when it is discovered is permanent and far worse than the original problem. Asking real customers properly is slower and it is the only version that survives scrutiny.
Free consultation · No obligation
One search, screenshotted from a clean browser, with an honest assessment of how much you control and how much of it actually matters.
Name, number, email, what you need.